Breadcrumbs
- You are here:
 - 
											Home
					
											
							
						
										
				 - 
											Forums
					
											
							
						
										
				 - 
											DIscussions
					
											
							
						
										
				 - 
											Tech Help
					
											
							
						
										
				 - Limited panel depth for radios
 
Limited panel depth for radios
- David Hetrick
 - Offline
 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 10
 
			
	
						15 Jun 2025 08:57				#1
		by David Hetrick
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by David Hetrick on topic Limited panel depth for radios			
			
				I installed a Becker 6201 at the bottom 2 1/4 hole in my panel. Very happy with the radio.			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Brooks McNew
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 124
 
			
	
						08 Jun 2025 16:17				#2
		by Brooks McNew
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by Brooks McNew on topic Limited panel depth for radios			
			
				I used to make the drive to Kent, OH regularly - that's in the same area if I remember correctly. Small world.
Well, if you get desperate enough to fly out to Maryland... I bet we could get that radio installed in a day or two and I my A&P/IA would probably sign off on it after inspecting the work. I just got done doing mine and he had no issues with the installation. I'd just want to double check with him beforehand and make sure we have all the little bits and pieces ready to go for you.
					Well, if you get desperate enough to fly out to Maryland... I bet we could get that radio installed in a day or two and I my A&P/IA would probably sign off on it after inspecting the work. I just got done doing mine and he had no issues with the installation. I'd just want to double check with him beforehand and make sure we have all the little bits and pieces ready to go for you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jim Kadel
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 4
 
			
	
						06 Jun 2025 08:20				#3
		by Jim Kadel
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by Jim Kadel on topic Limited panel depth for radios			
			
				Portsmouth, Ohio     home airport  KPMH    approx. 100 miles from Cincinnati   avionics shop with Ercoupe experience.    Eastern Cincinnati Avionics (owned by Sporty's			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Brooks McNew
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 124
 
			
	
						05 Jun 2025 14:24				#4
		by Brooks McNew
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by Brooks McNew on topic Limited panel depth for radios			
			
				Where are you, Jim?			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jim Kadel
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 4
 
			
	
						05 Jun 2025 12:11				#5
		by Jim Kadel
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by Jim Kadel on topic Limited panel depth for radios			
			
				I appreciate your advice and suggestions,   Now, to locate an avionics shop nearby without a 9 month waiting list.     Small county airports (like mine) are becoming very disadvantaged form the unavailability of AP  AI or Avionics technicians and mechanics.      Jim K.			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Keith Whitcomb
 
			
	
						31 May 2025 23:08				#6
		by Keith Whitcomb
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by Keith Whitcomb on topic Limited panel depth for radios			
			
				The STC is the kicker.   You can try to do a 337 field approval.
These days your FAA types aren't looking for a reason to say yes. They are predisposed to say no.
My avionics guy used to do 337’s a couple times a week. Then he got burned. He was working on a Bell helicopter that could have come from Bell with the option of a particular box. The original buyer didn’t and the current owner wanted to add the box.
It cost him a couple weeks fiddling with the FAA about a 337:feild approval that used to be routinely approved. They wanted the technical data that Bell didn’t want to share in order to approve.
Not all FSDO’s are that way. The workaround is to hire a DAR/DER
					These days your FAA types aren't looking for a reason to say yes. They are predisposed to say no.
My avionics guy used to do 337’s a couple times a week. Then he got burned. He was working on a Bell helicopter that could have come from Bell with the option of a particular box. The original buyer didn’t and the current owner wanted to add the box.
It cost him a couple weeks fiddling with the FAA about a 337:feild approval that used to be routinely approved. They wanted the technical data that Bell didn’t want to share in order to approve.
Not all FSDO’s are that way. The workaround is to hire a DAR/DER
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
		Time to create page: 0.063 seconds