Breadcrumbs
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forums
-
Classifieds
-
Wanted
- Wood prop
Wood prop
- Brooks McNew
-
- Away
Less
More
- Posts: 151
14 Feb 2026 15:25 #7
by Brooks McNew
Replied by Brooks McNew on topic Wood prop
My McCauley 1a90 got red tagged when I tried to have it trimmed and repitched. I decided to go with a Sensenich wood prop which will be arriving early next week.
I'll post a report of my experience as soon as I get to fly it.
I'll post a report of my experience as soon as I get to fly it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mac McCormick
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 112
17 Jan 2026 18:01 - 19 Feb 2026 17:46 #8
by Mac McCormick
Cheers!
"Two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking and two more unaccounted for..." ~Anonymous B-36 Pilot
Replied by Mac McCormick on topic Wood prop
Hi Warren,
I've learned I have the C75C85 upgrade, the upper limit appears to be 2575 RPM for one. Still digging through all 80 years worth of logs and paperwork! Based on what you were saying earlier, can I go to a wood prop and still have decent performance and climb? I am seeing in the 718 something about having a max static RPM limit of 2100 with wood under the Sensenich section.
I've learned I have the C75
Cheers!
"Two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking and two more unaccounted for..." ~Anonymous B-36 Pilot
Attachments:
Last edit: 19 Feb 2026 17:46 by Mac McCormick.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Warren Hampton
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 482
26 Jun 2024 00:55 #9
by Warren Hampton
Replied by Warren Hampton on topic Wood prop
Mac 48 & 49 are climb props Higher are cruise props, If you are flying out a short grass field then you want that climb. If you do mostly short flights Makes little dif which prop you have. If you make most longer flights then maybe a higher pitch is called for I Made most 500 +/- trip San Diego to San Josa and gas was affordable then.so I flew mostly all the way in. So go how ever you fly! To me a little faster makes up for a little more gas..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mac McCormick
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 112
25 Jun 2024 20:28 #10
by Mac McCormick
Cheers!
"Two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking and two more unaccounted for..." ~Anonymous B-36 Pilot
Replied by Mac McCormick on topic Wood prop
Roger that!
Cheers!
"Two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking and two more unaccounted for..." ~Anonymous B-36 Pilot
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Snyder
25 Jun 2024 20:11 #11
by Larry Snyder
Replied by Larry Snyder on topic Wood prop
You should be able to use the 71” prop you have on a C-85. I have a 71-49 on my C-85 and I really like that setup.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Snyder
25 Jun 2024 20:06 #12
by Larry Snyder
Replied by Larry Snyder on topic Wood prop
Like I said, a major reason has been the fact O-200 crankshafts are easier to find. Having flown different planes, the C-85 at 2500 can deliver more speed and climb since you can still swing a 71 inch prop, unlike the O-200 which is limited to 68 inches.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.066 seconds